SalesCollab

AssetTrack vs Asset Panda

AssetTrack vs Asset Panda: the honest comparison.

Asset Panda is the most configurable asset platform on the market — and the heaviest. AssetTrack is the lightweight, hosted alternative that finishes setup before Asset Panda's first sales call ends.

What Asset Panda is good at

Asset Panda has been in the market for over a decade and has built a deeply configurable platform: every field, form, workflow and report is user-editable, with a long list of enterprise customers using it as their system of record across IT, fleet, fit-out and field equipment. Its mobile app is genuinely capable, its custom-field engine is unmatched, and its integration list is extensive.

  • Deeply configurable — every field, workflow, role and report user-editable
  • Long-standing mobile app with proven offline support
  • Extensive integration library across procurement, ITSM and accounting
  • Strong fit for very large fleets with non-standard asset categories
  • Established enterprise sales and customer success motion

Where Asset Panda leaves gaps

  • No published pricing — every engagement starts with a sales call and a multi-week scoping phase
  • Setup typically takes weeks to months because the configurability has to be configured
  • No free tier — entry typically lands around $1,500/year minimum with significant uplift for the modules most teams actually need
  • AI governance, network discovery agent, signed chain of custody with on-screen signature on every handover — not the default flow
  • Mid-market teams often pay for capabilities they never enable

When AssetTrack is the better fit

You're a mid-market IT, finance or operations team that wants a working register this week, not a six-month implementation. You'd rather start with sensible defaults and a free tier than configure your way to a system from a blank canvas. You want signed handovers, network discovery, mobile audits and per-category depreciation included — not as add-on modules priced separately. AssetTrack also wins where you need the public REST API for governance dashboards or where MSP-style multi-tenancy is required out of the box.

When Asset Panda is the better fit

You're a large enterprise with very long-running, non-standard asset programmes (specialised fleet, lab, manufacturing) where you genuinely need every field and workflow re-imagined for your category, and you have a dedicated admin to configure and maintain that. Asset Panda is also the safer pick if procurement requires a tier-1 vendor with a 10+ year track record and an account team.

Frequently asked questions

Is AssetTrack cheaper than Asset Panda?

Yes, materially. AssetTrack is free today (billing in finalisation) and will price on tracked-asset tiers, not per-seat. Asset Panda's entry is typically $1,500+/year with significant uplift for additional modules and seats — most engagements land in the five-figure range.

Will I lose features by moving from Asset Panda to AssetTrack?

You'll lose the deepest configurability (e.g. rebuilding every form from a blank canvas) and Asset Panda's longer integration list. You'll gain network discovery, AI governance insights, signed chain of custody on every handover, the public REST API and a free tier that lets non-admin users (auditors, finance, brokers) read the register without per-seat fees.

How long does AssetTrack take to set up vs Asset Panda?

AssetTrack: most teams have a working register within an afternoon of importing their CSV. Asset Panda: weeks to months because the configurability has to be configured for each customer.

Can I import data from Asset Panda into AssetTrack?

Yes. Asset Panda exports CSV; AssetTrack's importer maps the standard fields automatically and flags any rows that need attention before commit.

Related

Full comparison tableAsset registerPricing

Know what you own. Who has it. What it’s worth.

Free workspace while we finish billing. Import a CSV and you’ll know within an hour whether AssetTrack fits.